Long-term English Learners are a signal that district systems need to change. Learn what superintendents and school boards can do now to accelerate proficiency, reduce LTEL numbers, and expand opportunity for every English Learner.
Check out this latest post from our founder, John Kresky. Subscribe to our Newsletter to Stay Ahead in Multilingual Education.
This is not simply an instructional issue. It is a governance and leadership issue—one that requires board-level attention to goals, metrics, and system design.
Achieving full English proficiency within five years is not an arbitrary benchmark. It aligns with federal accountability expectations for timely English language proficiency under ESSA, and is a critical window during which students can develop the language skills necessary to fully engage with rigorous academic content. When English Learners reclassify timely, they gain access to a broader curriculum, stronger postsecondary options, and greater agency over their educational trajectories.
When districts allow students to remain in ELD programs year after year without sufficient progress, stagnation becomes normalized—and expectations quietly erode. In too many systems, LTEL status is treated as an unfortunate but inevitable outcome rather than a signal that instructional models, resource allocation, or expectations need to change.
Consistent evidence from research and practice shows that one proficiency-level gain per year…is attainable across domains (Listening, Speaking, Reading, and Writing) when districts provide coherent instructional models and sustained support. Achieving this requires intentional planning, coherent instructional models, and—most importantly—district leaders who make English language proficiency a strategic priority rather than a compliance obligation.
Districts serious about reducing LTELs must intervene earlier. Potential Long-term English Learners (p-LTELs) in grades four and five should be clearly identified, monitored, and supported before they transition to middle school. This is the most cost-effective and instructionally sound point of intervention. Waiting until sixth grade is often too late.
At the same time, current LTELs in grades six through twelve must not be overlooked. These students need targeted, accelerated language development aligned to grade-level content—not remedial coursework that isolates students from rigorous content and peers. Reclassification for secondary LTELs should be treated as an urgent outcome, not a distant hope.
Reducing the number of LTELs produces benefits that directly affect district performance indicators, public accountability, and communities. Districts see improved accountability outcomes, fewer annual ELP assessments, higher graduation rates, stronger college-going patterns, and lower dropout rates. Communities benefit from a more competitive workforce, with students entering adulthood better prepared to contribute economically and civically.
There is also a fiscal and policy dimension that superintendents and boards must confront directly.
There is a declining tolerance for prolonged English Learner status without clear evidence of acceleration. While Title III funding for FY26 was approved, skepticism was driven by perceptions that the program has not consistently accelerated English language acquisition, proficiency growth, or timely reclassification.
Looking ahead, districts should anticipate increased scrutiny and tighter expectations regarding how federal dollars translate into English proficiency gains. The implication is clear: continued investment will increasingly depend on demonstrable outcomes.
District leaders would be wise to respond proactively—by shaping expectations now rather than reacting later to external mandates. Prioritize Title III funds to accelerate proficiency growth and reclassification—particularly for long-term English Learners. Doing so demonstrates a strong return on federal investment (ROI) and reduces the likelihood of deeper federal intervention or future funding restrictions tied to extended EL enrollment.
A Call to District Leadership: What Superintendents and School Boards Must Do Now
This moment calls for pragmatic, results-oriented leadership grounded in evidence, transparency, and continuous improvement. Superintendents and school boards must set clear expectations that English Learners will make consistent annual progress, that p-LTELs will be supported before they become LTELs, and that current LTELs will be provided with accelerated pathways to reclassification.
The goal is not simply to exit students from a program. The goal is to expand opportunity, strengthen accountability, and ensure that English Learners are fully prepared for college, careers, and civic life.
Long-term English Learners are not evidence of student failure. LTELs are evidence that systems—over time—have failed to deliver what research already tells us is possible.
The evidence is clear, the strategies are known—what remains is the collective resolve to lead.